Comments on: Siebel Adapter for BizTalk Server 2006 http://fehlberg.wordpress.com/2008/03/19/siebel-adapter-for-biztalk-server-2006/ Lessons learned in BizTalk Server, C# and Java Wed, 18 Nov 2009 23:49:05 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 By: Fehlberg Victor http://fehlberg.wordpress.com/2008/03/19/siebel-adapter-for-biztalk-server-2006/#comment-194 Fehlberg Victor Mon, 31 Aug 2009 15:17:42 +0000 http://fehlberg.wordpress.com/?p=13#comment-194 Reddy, From what I've seen, there really aren't many things you can do to improve performance using the "old" Siebel adapter (as opposed to the new WCF Siebel adapter). The one parameter you can change is "Max Concurrent Calls." The value you should set this to depends on how well the Siebel system performs. If it sits on fast machines, you can set the value to a higher number. In my case, I didn't have real fast machines, so I set the value to 2. Let me know if you find out about any other settings that I'm not aware of. --Victor Fehlberg Reddy,

From what I’ve seen, there really aren’t many things you can do to improve performance using the “old” Siebel adapter (as opposed to the new WCF Siebel adapter). The one parameter you can change is “Max Concurrent Calls.” The value you should set this to depends on how well the Siebel system performs. If it sits on fast machines, you can set the value to a higher number. In my case, I didn’t have real fast machines, so I set the value to 2.

Let me know if you find out about any other settings that I’m not aware of.

–Victor Fehlberg

]]> By: Reddy http://fehlberg.wordpress.com/2008/03/19/siebel-adapter-for-biztalk-server-2006/#comment-193 Reddy Sun, 30 Aug 2009 20:38:57 +0000 http://fehlberg.wordpress.com/?p=13#comment-193 Can you suggest what binding properties have you configured to achieve better performance. Thanks in advance Can you suggest what binding properties have you configured to achieve better performance.

Thanks in advance

]]>