<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DTA Orphaned Instances</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fehlberg.wordpress.com/2008/08/05/dta-orphaned-instances/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fehlberg.wordpress.com/2008/08/05/dta-orphaned-instances/</link>
	<description>Lessons learned in BizTalk Server, C# and Java</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 23:49:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Fehlberg Victor</title>
		<link>http://fehlberg.wordpress.com/2008/08/05/dta-orphaned-instances/#comment-99</link>
		<dc:creator>Fehlberg Victor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 23:06:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fehlberg.wordpress.com/?p=44#comment-99</guid>
		<description>Raul,

I think I need a little more background to understand your situation.  Can you briefly describe your orchestration?  I&#039;m not sure what you mean by it waiting to be consumed... Why is it not ending on its own?  I need you to clarify a bit to figure out what&#039;s going on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Raul,</p>
<p>I think I need a little more background to understand your situation.  Can you briefly describe your orchestration?  I&#8217;m not sure what you mean by it waiting to be consumed&#8230; Why is it not ending on its own?  I need you to clarify a bit to figure out what&#8217;s going on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: raul caceres</title>
		<link>http://fehlberg.wordpress.com/2008/08/05/dta-orphaned-instances/#comment-96</link>
		<dc:creator>raul caceres</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 18:38:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fehlberg.wordpress.com/?p=44#comment-96</guid>
		<description>hi
my problem is
im have orchestration in state active that wait for be comsumed int el biztalkMsgboxDB , i reset the host instance y nothing.
its same orhcestration are in the BIZTALKDTAdb In state STARTED , this have not a dtEndTime  and DtStartTime , some will can say how complet this instances.
thank you</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi<br />
my problem is<br />
im have orchestration in state active that wait for be comsumed int el biztalkMsgboxDB , i reset the host instance y nothing.<br />
its same orhcestration are in the BIZTALKDTAdb In state STARTED , this have not a dtEndTime  and DtStartTime , some will can say how complet this instances.<br />
thank you</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Victor Fehlberg</title>
		<link>http://fehlberg.wordpress.com/2008/08/05/dta-orphaned-instances/#comment-87</link>
		<dc:creator>Victor Fehlberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 16:58:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fehlberg.wordpress.com/?p=44#comment-87</guid>
		<description>Great point Yossi regarding long-running orchestrations.  Presumably this is why BizTalk doesn&#039;t get rid of these.  It would seem there should be some other way for BizTalk to differentiate these (or if not, that the design should change).  Thanks for the comment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great point Yossi regarding long-running orchestrations.  Presumably this is why BizTalk doesn&#8217;t get rid of these.  It would seem there should be some other way for BizTalk to differentiate these (or if not, that the design should change).  Thanks for the comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yossi Dahan</title>
		<link>http://fehlberg.wordpress.com/2008/08/05/dta-orphaned-instances/#comment-86</link>
		<dc:creator>Yossi Dahan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 07:37:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fehlberg.wordpress.com/?p=44#comment-86</guid>
		<description>Thanks Victor, I never knew that, and when checking our environment we have found a few &quot;orphaned&quot; instances. 
The scope of the problem seems very small, at least on our production environment, never-the-less we now have a job to clear those outside the hard delete time window of the scheduled purge job.
We don&#039;t have long-running processes, so this is safe to do. this would be a bigger problem for anyone who does as it&#039;s hard to tell which instances can safetly be removed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Victor, I never knew that, and when checking our environment we have found a few &#8220;orphaned&#8221; instances.<br />
The scope of the problem seems very small, at least on our production environment, never-the-less we now have a job to clear those outside the hard delete time window of the scheduled purge job.<br />
We don&#8217;t have long-running processes, so this is safe to do. this would be a bigger problem for anyone who does as it&#8217;s hard to tell which instances can safetly be removed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
